Insights>News

The Brief

Every modification to systems, applications or network configurations introduces new attack vectors. Without a structured process—review, test, and approval—organizations create security gaps: misconfigurations, unpatched vulnerabilities, or unintended exposure.

What to Do Now:

Adopt a disciplined change‑management framework that documents every change, evaluates its impact, and aligns with compliance requirements. This discipline not only prevents breaches but also provides the traceability incident responders need to pinpoint contributing changes.

Deep Dive: Analysis & Implications
1. The Risk Landscape

Attackers routinely exploit overlooked adjustments.
Uncontrolled changes can leave systems exposed to exploitation.
2. The Protective Power of Structured Change Management

Documentation: Every change is recorded, creating an audit trail.
Impact Assessment: Changes are evaluated for security and compliance implications before deployment.

Traceability: Incident responders can quickly identify recent changes that may have contributed to a security event.

3. The Dual Role of the Discipline

Acts as a preventive control, stopping vulnerabilities before they’re introduced.
Serves as the foundation for maintaining a secure, stable environment.

Business Impact & Risk Analysis

Security Gaps: Misconfigurations, unpatched software, and unintended exposure.

Compliance Violations: Failure to meet regulatory requirements can lead to fines and reputational damage.

Operational Disruption: Unplanned outages or degraded performance due to poorly managed changes.

The Strategic Questions
Do we have a formal change‑management policy that requires review, testing, and approval for all changes?
How do we document each change and maintain an audit trail?
What impact‑assessment procedures are in place to evaluate security and compliance risks before deployment?
Can incident responders quickly trace recent changes that may have contributed to a security event?

How We Help
Change‑Management Framework Design

We craft policies that enforce review, testing, and approval for every change.

Implementation & Training

We help deploy tools and train teams to maintain disciplined change processes.

Audit & Continuous Improvement

We assess your current practices, identify gaps, and recommend enhancements to strengthen security posture.

Contact us for a confidential consultation on building a robust change‑management program that protects your services and keeps you compliant.

Author: Shaun Diaz, CISSP, CC, Security +, Microsoft AI Fundamentals

The Brief:
In 2025, businesses are rapidly adopting powerful third‑party AI tools—from marketing to software development. Procurement is frequently done on an ad‑hoc basis using standard click‑through agreements.
Why It Matters:
These tools expose firms to data breaches, IP infringement, and discriminatory outcomes. Default vendor contracts shift liability onto you, making your organization legally accountable for the AI’s actions.
What to Do Now:
Pause the decentralized adoption of AI tools immediately. Implement a formal AI procurement policy that requires rigorous legal and technical review of every vendor before integration.

Deep Dive: Analysis & Implications
The Background
AI deployment is accelerating. From drafting emails to writing code and analyzing customer data, third‑party AI vendors deliver undeniable productivity gains. Teams may already be using these tools—whether or not they have a formal policy—in the same way they treat other SaaS subscriptions.
Unlike your CRM or cloud storage, generative AI and other advanced systems process your data and generate novel output, creating a complex, unprecedented surface area for legal risk. When an employee uses a third‑party AI to create marketing copy, analyze sensitive HR data, or write proprietary code, your company inherits the legal consequences of those operations—mostly beyond your control. Relying on a vendor’s one‑sided Terms of Service exposes you to significant legal risk.
Default terms may grant vendors a broad license to use your confidential information for training future public models, effectively leaking proprietary data. Under GDPR and CPRA, you remain the data controller, making you liable for the vendor’s security posture and cross‑border transfer compliance.
Business Impact & Risk Analysis
1. Data Security & Privacy Risk
When employees input data into a third‑party AI tool, you lose control over that data. The vendor may use it to train future models, and you must ensure they cannot do so.
2. Intellectual Property Risk
There are two main risks:
• Ownership: Can you claim copyright over marketing copy or code generated by the tool? Can you protect it as a trade secret? Vendor terms are often vague, leaving ownership unclear.
• Infringement: If the AI was trained on copyrighted material without a license, its output could be infringing. Your contract should provide meaningful indemnification.
3. Compliance & Discrimination Risk
Regulators make it clear companies cannot delegate compliance obligations to algorithms. If a vendor’s AI produces biased outcomes—e.g., in hiring or credit decisions—you’ll be liable. The “vendor’s black box, not ours” defense will not hold up under scrutiny from the EEOC or FTC. Secure contractual rights to audit for bias and understand the tool’s decision‑making process.

The Strategic Questions
• Does the vendor’s contract provide meaningful indemnification if their AI generates infringing content?
• What are the precise data‑processing terms, and do they unequivocally prevent the vendor from using our confidential business information to train general models?
• If a regulatory fine arises from a biased decision by the vendor’s AI, what contractual rights do we have to hold the vendor financially accountable?
• Have we performed adequate due diligence on the vendor’s cybersecurity practices and verified compliance with cross‑border data transfer rules?
Failure to answer these questions signals a serious red flag.

How We Help
AI Vendor Contract Review & Negotiation
We analyze agreements to protect data, secure IP rights, and allocate liability.
AI Procurement Policy Development
We collaborate with legal and IT teams to establish firm‑wide governance for vetting, approving, and managing AI tools.
AI Risk & Compliance Assessments
We review your current AI usage to identify hidden risks and develop a mitigation roadmap.
Contact us to discuss integrating vendor AI into your organization.

Author: Staff Writer